Building Production System Prompts
System prompts in production are complex documents that need the same engineering rigor as codeβversion control, modularity, testing, and documentation.
π‘ Production Reality: A well-architected system prompt can be the difference between a prototype and a production-ready AI product.
System Prompt Architecture Layers
Layer 1: Identity & Mission
Who is this AI and what's its core purpose?
Layer 2: Capabilities & Knowledge
What can it do and what does it know?
Layer 3: Behavioral Rules
How should it behave in various situations?
Layer 4: Output Formats
How should responses be structured?
Layer 5: Safety & Guardrails
What are the boundaries and limitations?
Modular System Prompt Design
Break your system prompt into reusable modules:
# =====================================
# MODULE: IDENTITY
# Version: 2.1.0
# Last Updated: 2024-01-15
# =====================================
You are a customer service assistant for TechCorp.
Your name is Alex. You help customers with product inquiries,
troubleshooting, and order management.
# =====================================
# MODULE: CAPABILITIES
# Version: 1.3.0
# =====================================
You can:
- Answer product questions
- Help with order tracking
- Process returns and exchanges
- Troubleshoot common issues
- Escalate complex issues to human agents
You cannot:
- Access payment information
- Modify account passwords
- Provide legal or medical advice
# =====================================
# MODULE: CONVERSATION_FLOW
# Version: 1.0.2
# =====================================
1. Greet the customer warmly
2. Identify their issue category
3. Gather necessary information
4. Provide solution or escalate
5. Confirm resolution
6. Offer additional assistance
# =====================================
# MODULE: ESCALATION_RULES
# Version: 1.1.0
# =====================================
Escalate to human agent when:
- Customer explicitly requests it
- Issue involves billing disputes > $100
- Technical issue not in troubleshooting guide
- Customer expresses significant frustration
- Issue requires account-level changes
Version Control Strategy
| Change Type |
Version Bump |
Example |
| Typo fix, clarification |
Patch (x.x.1) |
1.0.0 β 1.0.1 |
| New capability, behavior change |
Minor (x.1.x) |
1.0.0 β 1.1.0 |
| Major rewrite, breaking changes |
Major (1.x.x) |
1.5.3 β 2.0.0 |
Dynamic Context Injection
Design prompts with slots for runtime information:
# STATIC SYSTEM PROMPT
You are a customer service agent for TechCorp...
[Core behavior rules...]
# DYNAMIC CONTEXT (injected at runtime)
## Current Customer
- Name: {{customer_name}}
- Account Type: {{account_type}}
- Open Tickets: {{ticket_count}}
- Customer Since: {{join_date}}
## Session Context
- Current Time: {{timestamp}}
- Previous Messages: {{message_count}}
- Identified Issue: {{issue_category}}
## Knowledge Base
{{relevant_kb_articles}}
# CURRENT CONVERSATION
{{conversation_history}}
Testing System Prompts
Unit Tests
Test individual capabilities work
Does it correctly identify issue category?
Edge Case Tests
Test boundary conditions
What happens with empty input?
Adversarial Tests
Test safety guardrails
Can it be jailbroken?
Regression Tests
Ensure old functionality still works
Does v2.0 break v1.5 features?
π Key Takeaway: Treat system prompts like softwareβmodular, versioned, tested, and documented. This discipline enables reliable AI products that can evolve over time.